I changed the configuration so that the 'reply-to' header isn't munged anymore. The only exception remains issues@ as per Karl's comment, which still points to dev@.
-Andreas
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 09:14:37AM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Andreas Guenther <aguenther@collab.net> writes:
> > Below you'll see the current settings in regards to the Reply-To header for each list:
> >
> > [announce@subversion]
> > Reply-To: users@subversion
> >
> > [committers@subversion]
> > Reply-To: committers@subversion
> >
> > [dev@subversion]
> > Reply-To: SENDER
> >
> > [issues@subversion]
> > Reply-To: dev@subversion
> >
> > [svn@subversion]
> > Reply-To: SENDER
> >
> > [users@subversion]
> > Reply-To header is completely stripped
> >
> > I will talk to Karl about the above settings and correct them accordingly.
>
> I assume by "SENDER" you just mean that the Reply-to is left however
> the sender set it (and if there is no Reply-to, none is added). That
> is the correct setting for every list above, except 'issues', which
> can remain 'dev'. [Although even then, the preferable way to
> implement would be for the issue tracker itself to set Reply-to to
> 'dev', and for the mailing list to leave it alone... However, I'm not
> going to quibble :-).]
>
> Thanks, Andreas. I have login on tigris.org, but looking at those
> conf files, I have the strong feeling that I'd be more likely to mess
> this up than get it right.
>
> -Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 15 21:10:18 2003