AW: UpdateCheckURL not working as expected
From: <Markus.Liebelt_at_t-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:25:45 +0100
I have rechecked what Stefan proposed, and have now a working version. I did not have to escape the `+` in the URL, and have not added a newline.
I have noticed in testing that I got during test an older version of the textfile due to a caching proxy. So I moved the webserver from which the textfile was provided to my local machine, and could then see that it did work well. Perhaps the caching proxy was my problem all the time.
I have rechecked and the additional newline did not make any difference. Perhaps it was just a mis-perception on my side. What I have noticed is, that the dialog that shows if a new version is available only links to the website of the textfile if and only if a new version is available. Else it links to tortoisesvn.tirgris.org.
Thanks a lot for the help, I hope we have now a stable working solution.
Markus
We followed the recipe at http://tortoisesvn.net/docs/release/TortoiseSVN_en/tsvn-admins-upgradecheck.html how to ensure that update checks look for a version provided by our company, so that users don't update by mistake. The check works as expected, with the one exception, that the URL we have provided in the file "tsvn-version.txt" is not used, but the default URL registered in the product. I have checked that the registry entry is correct (HKCU\Software\TortoiseSVN\UpdateCheckURL).
The file contents of tsvn-version.txt currently is:
So we want that the user visits the confluence page and looks there for the current version. Previously, we have provided as URL the download location for the new binary to install, but that did not work either.
I have used the information at Microsoft what the registry entries mean: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371168(VS.85).aspx
Our content in the registry is:
The file is found correctly, because the update dialog knows that the version 1.6.12.20536 is the current one (see screenshot below).
I don't have any idea what could be wrong here, and I have searched on the internet and did not find any resource beside the doc page at the beginning of this report. So what is our fault, where are we going wrong?
< OLE-Objekt: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Thank you for your help
Markus Liebelt
-- mailto:markus.liebelt_at_t-systems.com ------------------------------------------------------ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2890575 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].Received on 2011-12-05 15:26:11 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.