[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Visual Studio Integration happiness

From: Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:44:24 -0400

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 13:36, Loritsch, Berin <bloritsch_at_dtri.net> wrote:
> In the for what it’s worth department, it appears that Visual SVN plays
> nicely with TortoiseSVN.  In fact it requires it as a dependency.  That
> means you get the best of both worlds.  Only downside is that it costs money
> for something that is free on any other platform.
>

I don't see how this is better than the other approaches you were
railing against last week. VisualSVN requires that you acquire
TortoiseSVN separately & still keep everything in sync. How is this
different from any other client situation, whether it's a plug-in to
Visual Studio or standalone?

Also, they recommend the "latest stable release" of TSVN as 1.6.9.
It's 1.6.10 now.

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2660985

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-09-16 19:45:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.