[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: not "the usual" missing icon overlay question

From: Robert Roessler <robertr_at_rftp.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:28:13 -0700

Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On 25.05.2010 08:43, Lorenz wrote:
>>> Stefan Küng wrote:
>>>> On 21.05.2010 15:45, Lorenz wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> Until recently that was possible by unticking all drive type options
>>>>> and adding the respective paths to the include list.
>>>>> That is, a check mark in the drive typs section had the same result as
>>>>> adding all drive roots of the respective type to the include list.
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't seem to work any longer.
>>>>>
>>>>> To get what I want, I now additionally need to check 'Fixed drives'
>>>>> and 'Network drives' and add all drive roots to the exclude list.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you now have to allow the drive type to make this work.
>>>
>>> Ok. That explains what I'm seeing, and I can get the desired behaviour
>>> back by adjusting my configuration.
>>>
>>> Is there a compulsory reason for this change?
>>>
>>> I found the old behaviour much more convenient - especially in cases
>>> where you want icon overlays only on a small number of directorys
>>> scattered over a small part of the local and remote drives present.
>>
>> Maybe Stefan^2 knows more about the why.
> Looks like a that feature got removed accidentally.
> I should be able to fix that coming weekend.

Sweet - I have been depending on that mode of operation for a long time
too - thanks for restoring it (well, when you do, anyway)! :)

Robert Roessler

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2613419

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-05-26 02:28:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.