2010/1/7 ThanksButNo <no.no.thanks_at_gmail.com>:
> Thanks, Bob -- I believe I've resolved this, but for the record --
> On Jan 7, 2:04 pm, Bob Archer <bob.arc..._at_amsi.com> wrote:
>> > I have included "bin" to the TortoiseSVN->Settings:Patterns to
>> > Ignore
>> > list
>> > I have included "bin/*" to same list.
>> Keep in mind... that ignored files are only ignored if they are NOT versioned. If your bin folder or its contents are in your repository they are going to get overlays.
> "bin" folder has NOT been versioned to repository. I just checked.
>> > I have included "**/.svn" to the Eclipse Source Exclude list.
>> Erm.... .svn knows that .svn is not a versioned folder already. You shouldn't need to excluded or ignore it. Are you getting .svn folders in your repository?
> No .svn folders in repository. Again, I just checked.
> I think it knows to ignore ".svn", but it's not ignoring the folder
> which now contains additional items, so the folder itself is now
> "different". I'm not sure whether or not I'm describing a bug.
Not a bug. If Eclipse copies a .svn folder into bin/A then as far as a
subversion client is concerned 'A' is a versioned folder because it
contains a .svn folder. It is Eclipse that caused the problem, if only
by not being SVN-aware in its copying.
> But this might again be a file vs. folder issue. As I'd posted in
> another response, adding "**/.svn/" to the exclusion list seems to
> work. I suppose for "**/.svn" it's looking for ".svn" as a file, but
> with "**/.svn/" it knows that it's a folder.
Maybe, but it is an Eclipse issue, not a subversion issue.
: oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
: \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
: /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-01-08 10:47:17 CET