[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Feature request: SubWCRev if not inside a working copy

From: Daniel Becroft <djcbecroft_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:09:47 +1000

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Gingko <from_tigris_at_nospam.homelinux.org>wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Wilson" <ronw.mrmx_at_gmail.com>
> To: <users_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Feature request: SubWCRev if not inside a working copy
> > Why do you need a parallel working copy? If you want to discard
> > changes, you can simply revert them.
> Because I commonly maintain several different changes, often in the same
> file, that (nearly always) I do not want to commit at the same time.
> How can I (easily !) revert a change in a file without also revert all
> other
> changes in the same file ?
If that's the case, why can you not simply check-out multiple working
copies, rather than using 'unversioned' copies? If it's a bandwidth issue,
then you can copy an existing working copy entirely, then revert all changes
in the copy.

Daniel B.

<snip />


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-10-20 08:10:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.