Re: Feature Request: Option to *always* commit all the changes in the *entire* working copy.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:29, Nick Sabalausky<business4_at_semitwist.com> wrote:
> levyam Full name Andy Levy Date 2009-08-04 05:24:45 PDT
>>An option which is presented to the user but poorly understood because
>>the user doesn't understand the use case
>
> I understand the use case perfectly well, and I'm asserting that the current
> measures are unsatisfactory.
>
> And stop trying insist I don't understand it, because that just leads the
> discussion in circles. "Yes I do, No you don't, Yes I do, No You don't".

I never said that. I said that you're the only person who DOES
understand the use case and see utility in this option (while ignoring
valid alternate workflows). My users would never comprehend this.

>>(note how many people are not
>>speaking up and saying "yes, I work this way too")
>
> The number of people who have responded at all hardly constitutes a
> meaningful sample size.

If everyone else here arguing against this were arguing for it, would
you say the same? Or would you use it to defend your position?

I'm finished with this thread, as you're clearly not interested in
understanding my points.

------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=2380379

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-08-05 12:27:42 CEST