[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Two questions on TSVN

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:54:25 +0200

Robert Roessler wrote:
> First, an install-related question:
> When I uninstalled 16624 (x64) prior to installing the 16664 (x64)
> nightly on my Vista SP2 x64 system, I noticed that there were 2 entries
> in the system Uninstall window both labeled "TortoiseOverlays", and both
> showing "Product version 1.0.11866" - one with size 316 KB, and the
> other with 396 KB.
> The uninstall removed neither of these, and after installing 16664, I
> still have the same 2 "TortoiseOverlays" entries. Are either of these
> artifacts that I can/should remove?

TSVN installs the overlays component as a merge-module, so it won't show
up at all in the uninstall window.
If you have entries there, they come from another Tortoise client which
uses the overlays msi instead of the merge-module. I suspect TCVS
because you have two entries: TCVS always installs both x64 and win32
version of the overlays component - that also explains the different
sizes of the two entries you have.

Entry in the uninstall window or not: the component isn't removed until
all Tortoise clients are uninstalled too since msi provides reference

> Also, I have TCVS 1.11.3 (x64) installed, which appears to happily
> "share" the overlays with TSVN... and I do not have a 32-bit TSVN installed.
> My other question is about the Revision graph - I have a checked-out
> tree from the Crypto++ project, using the URL
> https://cryptopp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/cryptopp/trunk
> and placing that in ...\cryptopp-trunk. Note that this top-level
> "trunk" is essentially empty, containing only a subdirectory "c5" - and
> .svn, of course.
> When right-clicking on cryptopp-trunk and asking for a Revision graph, I
> get a LESS-inclusive picture than I do if I request it for the "c5"
> subdirectory. They both indicate the same HEAD revision (469), but the
> one from the higher-level cryptopp-trunk omits the 459 and 460
> revisions, both of which deal with the most recent tag "CRYPTOPP_5_6_0".
> Is this expected?

Yes, because the tag "CRYPTOPP_5_6_0" was created from the c5 folder,
not the trunk folder. So the rev graph for the trunk doesn't show that.


  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-07-06 07:55:02 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.