[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Tortoise SVN: Best practise?

From: Bolstridge, Andrew <andy.bolstridge_at_intergraph.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:04 +0100

I tend to keep a single 'root' directory myself, and use the sparse
checkout feature to keep the local WC 'synced' with the repo. That way,
I know exactly which directory/branch/etc is which - because it mirrors
the layout in the repo.


It's difficult enough at my age to keep track of what I'm doing, let
alone try to remember which directory I checked which project out to J




From: Jens A Andersson [mailto:Jens_A.Andersson_at_eit.lth.se]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 1:00 PM
To: users_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Subject: Tortoise SVN: Best practise?


What is current best practice for storing local WCs? It seems that if
you have many folders - in my case some of them even Windows net folders
made available offline - where you have local WCs sparsely spread out
TSVN's scanning process takes a lot of resources. Are local WCs best
stored in one common folder, instead of store them in folders in
conjunction with their respective scope?


/Jens Andersson, LU


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-05-11 15:25:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.