[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.0 commit dialog

From: Jack C. Holt <jackcholt_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT)

I read http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/05/08/8467905.aspx
(before I made my post). Still the logic behind it escapes me. I
question the conventional wisdom. Why limit the number of ways of
doing the same thing? Especially when you obviously have people that
have become used to using your program in a certain way. You give
your users greater freedom in the way they do their work and let them
use the program in a way that is most efficient for them. Isn't that
a good thing?

Oh, and sorry about the "brain-dead" comment. Thank you for making
TortoiseSVN. It makes my job so much easier.

On Apr 3, 10:54 am, Kurt Pruenner <l..._at_gmx.at> wrote:
> Jack C. Holt wrote:
> > Since it was already in, it would seem to the me that the easiest
> > thing for the developer was to LEAVE it in.  Was there some overriding
> > reason for taking the time to remove it?
> As stated earlier in this very thread:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/05/08/8467905.aspx
> which was written by
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Chen
> so I think he knows a thing or three about Windows interface guidelines...
> --
> Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria
> .......It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N".......
> np: Autechre - Tkakanren (Quaristice Quadrange EP)
> ------------------------------------------------------http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMess...
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscr..._at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-04 15:30:02 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.