[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Odd behavior with svn mergeinfo

From: Simon Large <simon.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:58:12 +0100

2009/4/3 Greene, Geoffrey N <geoffrey.n.greene_at_boeing.com>:
> I did a merge of a single file with a simple history.
> $ svn -version
> svn, version 1.6.0 (r36650)
>   compiled Mar 27 2009, 14:18:27
>
> $ svn pg svn:mergeinfo file
> /branches/3.7_bugfix/file:11-17
>
> $ svn mergeinfo --show-revs eligible file
> r9
> r10
> r16
> r18
> $
> OK, that all makes sense.  I got that.  I merged versions 11 - 17 into
> my version from the 3.7_bugfix branch.  The rest (9,10, 16, and 18) are
> eligible TO be merged.
>
> Then why:
> $ svn mergeinfo --show-revs merged file
> $
> Shouldn't --show-revs merged show me that r11-17 were merged?  Why
> doesn't it?  What basic fact am I missing?  Why does it return nothing?

Wrong list. Questions about the subversion command line client need to
go to the subversion users list, not the TortoiseSVN users list.

Simon

-- 
:       ___
:  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
: (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
:   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
:   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=1536571
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-04 00:58:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.