[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Http bug? - two sets of PROPFIND statements found in packet trace between Tortoise and VisualSVNServer

From: BasementJack <basementjack2_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:35:42 -0800 (PST)

Stefan,

  Virus scanner sounds like a good avenue to look into, I'll need to
try that! I can totally see it mingling with the http traffic.
  I am using eset nod32 AV - are you aware of any issues with this
one?

  As for the comment about a missing log attachment and line 1&2, I
was talking about my response table:
  (I can see now that it's not as clear in some newsreaders as it was
when I wrote it due to line wrapping)

Test results: (checking out a small 10k project with a handful of
revisions)

Line 1:
  F: Tortoise client build 14361 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1 over http
Slow, double sets of PROPFINDS found in trace. 5-6 seconds
-----------------------------------------------------
Line 2:
F: Tortoise client build 14361 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1 over https
Slow - did not trace (did not expect to be able to decypher encrypted
https traffic) 5-6 seconds
----------------------------------------------------
Line 3:
A: Subversion command line client 1.5.3 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1
over
https: seemed reasonable (<1 second)
------------------------------------------------------
Line 4:
A+++: Tortoise client build 14361 -> SubversionTigrisServer 1.5.3
over
svn protocol FAST FAST FAST*** (<1 second) ***

Stefan Küng wrote:
> BasementJack wrote:
> > Using command line client, it seems very fast to the visualsvn https
> > server.
>
> Did you use the command line client on the same computer as TSVN?
>
> > So does that point to an issue with the TortoiseSVN client? would seem
> > to rule out the server a bit.
>
> Rules out the server, but not the client computer.
>
> > I realized that I only mentioned http in the title of my post, just
> > for the sake of clarity, Tortoise seems slow connecting to the
> > VisualSVN server (which uses either HTTP or HTTPS - I have tried both
> > and both are slow)
> >
> > Kurt, I tried the command line test, plus one other - results are
> > below...
> >
> > Test results: (checking out a small 10k project with a handful of
> > revisions)
> > F: Tortoise client build 14361 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1 over http
> > Slow, double sets of PROPFINDS found in trace. 5-6 seconds
> > F: Tortoise client build 14361 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1 over https
> > Slow - did not trace (did not expect to be able to decypher encrypted
> > https traffic) 5-6 seconds
> > A: Subversion command line client 1.5.3 -> VisualSVN server 1.6.1 over
> > https: seemed reasonable (<1 second)
> > A+++: Tortoise client build 14361 -> SubversionTigrisServer 1.5.3 over
> > svn protocol FAST FAST FAST*** (<1 second) ***
>
> Disable your virus scanner on the machine you're using TSVN, reboot
> (sorry, but from my experience, most of those scanners don't disable
> properly without), then try again.
>
> > Kurt, results line 1&2 were my originals, line 3 was the one you
>
> Line? Did you forget to attach a log file?
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-02 18:40:01 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.