[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Accessing %VERSION% parameter in update hook batch script

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:56:59 +0100

Simon Large wrote:
> On 07/03/2008, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Simon Large wrote:
>> >> Should we change our hook scripts to always pass *all* params in a
>> >> defined way?
>> >
>> > That would make the behaviour more like svn hooks, and we could also
>> > provide hook templates which would help with the documentation.
>> >
>> > Are there any disadvantages? What do others think?
>> One disadvantage, yes: the %PATHS% replacement would have to be dropped.
>> Because if that one is passed always, we could easily (too easily) cross
>> the limit of the command line length.
>> That means we'd have to only use %PATH% (the temp file containing the
>> list of files), which however makes it harder to write hook scripts
>> (they will have to read and parse that file first).
> I don't think that is a great loss. It should be no harder to parse a
> file containing one filename per line than it is to parse a single
> command line argument containing multiple filenames.

Done in r12295.


   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net

Received on 2008-03-08 17:57:17 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.