[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: ´ð¸´: Re: A performance issue

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-20 09:29:35 CET

On Nov 20, 2007 9:20 AM, Ö첪ºÀ <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:

>
> I knew that. So this is the key point that svn is slower than cvs?

1. svn is not slower than cvs. It is slower for some operations, much
faster in others.
2. there is no key point. it's a completely different system. That
means there are multiple factors which must be considered. This is
*one* point, not a key point or 'the' key point.

Stefan 

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on Tue Nov 20 09:49:46 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.