Hi Stefan,
I knew that. So this is the key point that svn is slower than cvs?
Thanks!
Best regards!
Sincerely,
Alex Zhu
Quality Engineering Department III
Sunnorth Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Tel: +86-10-62981668 Ext. 2792 (Office) / 2056 (3G Lab)
Fax: +86-10-62985972
Email: bohao@sunnorth.com.cn
"Stefan K¨¹ng" <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> дÓÚ 2007-11-20 16:06:22:
> On Nov 20, 2007 8:45 AM, Ö첪ºÀ <bohao@sunnorth.com.cn> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > :) I understand. Thus I have words to answer those questions. But
could give
> > me some detail that why they have such differences? I mean from the
buttom
> > view point eg. file system, data structure etc.
>
> CVS and Subversion are not the same.
>
> The svn performance when checking out a working copy is affected by
> NTFS and the fact that svn keeps a pristine copy of every file in the
> working copy. Have a look inside the '.svn' folders in every working
> copy and you will see what I mean.
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on Tue Nov 20 09:20:51 2007