On 6/20/07, Robert Roessler <robertr@rftp.com> wrote:
> Stefan Küng wrote:
> > Simon Large wrote:
> >>> "TSVNCache.exe also uses these paths to restrict its scanning. If you
> >>> want it to look only in particular folders, disable all drive types
> >>> and include only the folders you specifically want to be scanned."
> >>>
> >>> would be in order... or you could always make the software work that
> >>> way, of course. ;)
> >>
> >> Stefan, can you clarify how the drive types and exlude/include are
> >> supposed to interact. Something sounds wrong here.
> >
> > If a path is in the include list, it shows overlays, no matter what is
> > excluded.
> >
> > If a path is not in the include list, then the path is checked whether
> > it is on an allowed drive-type. If it is not, no overlays. If it is on
> > an allowed drive-type, the exclude list is considered.
>
> As I have now tried several times to report as a bug the fact that the
> 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 implementations depart from the documented behavior,
> I suppose I want to be clear on the status here... is this bug report
> being refused? Is more information required? Is there a different
> forum or procedure for submitting bug reports?
Don't worry, your report is not forgotten. But as you may have
noticed, there's other work to do in TSVN too. As soon as I get to the
cache again, I will have a closer look at this. It's not as if this
issue is something very important...
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 20 07:22:37 2007