RE: RE: $Source$

-----Original Message-----
From: Lübbe Onken [mailto:l.onken@rac.de]
Sent: 21 May 2007 09:42
To: 'users@tortoisesvn.tigris.org'
Subject: RE: $Source$

Hi Scott Pritchett,

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and mailing lists?

You wrote:
> So the onus is on the programmer to re-instate the keywords? Hmmm.

No No No! :(

> I quite like the way SCCS handles this. You check out a file
> and it has the keywords present, you work on the file, then,
> when you check it in a copy with the keywords expanded is
> left behind in the WC.

The keywords are *always* expanded in the WC after a repository operation.
They are *never* stored in expanded form in the repository. So locally it's
just the way you like it from SCCS.

> You have to do an explicit CO though,
> not very Subversion.

What does the author of this line want to tell us?!?

Cheers
- Lübbe

--
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Okay. Thanks, I think.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org