RE: RE: $Source$
From: Scott Pritchett <scott.pritchett_at_amtrak.co.uk>
Date: 2007-05-21 10:31:04 CEST
So the onus is on the programmer to re-instate the keywords? Hmmm.
I quite like the way SCCS handles this. You check out a file and it has the keywords present, you work on the file, then, when you check it in a copy with the keywords expanded is left behind in the WC. You have to do an explicit CO though, not very Subversion.
-----Original Message-----
Hi George Hazan,
You wrote:
> So you wanna say, that any SVN client passes its local code page to a
Your doubts are correct.
When a file is checked out/updated, the client fetches the file from the
*If* that file has the "svn:keywords" property set *and* contains matching
You now work with a file that contains the expanded keywords.
When that file is committed to the repository, _the client_ contracts the
The content (concrete value) of the keywords is never stored in the
Cheers
-- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.orgReceived on Mon May 21 10:28:54 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.