Simon Large wrote:
> Peter McNab wrote:
>> Simon Large wrote:
>>>
>>> Your first statement is correct, and the cumbersome workaround
>>> wouldn't work at all. Ignore patterns only work for files which are
>>> not yet versioned. Once you have placed a file under version control
>>> there is no way to ignore it.
>> Sorry, I wasn't aware that the case if you svn deleted it from
>> continued rev control?
>
> I was talking about the cumbersome workaround that Seth mentioned.
> Naturally if you svn delete (and commit) items they become unversioned
> once more.
>
> Simon
>
Just confirmed my understanding, that once files are removed (svn
deleted) from rev control then those files can be ignored.
And the process is not that hard.
Svn Delete them, Commit, Check for modifications, Tick show unversioned
files, right click each, Ignore them, (they disappear from list) and Commit.
Bingo, you only see what you want to see. Oh, and untick show
unversioned when done.
So for .DCUs you only have to ignore one for them all to disappear from
the list.
And if some files e.g. .CFG files are important to QA or whoever then
they probably should be of interest to everybody so the know when
something they just did changed the config.
I'm just not comfortable with the idea I could locally hide a revision
controlled file, make local changes and commit without knowing that in
advance of the commit. That is the feature Seth is asking for.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 27 12:58:42 2007