Re: Is it a bug or by design?
On 06.05.2010 13:30, Serge Tumanyan wrote:
> Hello, Simon.
>>> I has tryed to use TSVN client hooks and ran into a trouble:
>>> I have added a post update hook and assumed that this one should work
>>> the checkout, switch and update commands but found out that it works only
>>> after the update command. Is this by design or it is a bug? If this by
>>> design - can the hooks for checkout and switch commands be added to TSVN?
>>> reduces productivity when you can not recompile the WC after the checkout
>>> one step or after switching branches immediately and need to start a
>>> update process to start a script. The missing hooks for the switch
>>> tortures me especially much because I usually use switch command really
>>> often for my development tasks.
>> Why checkout? The hook scripts have to be set up for a specific WC, so
>> if you have not checked out a WC yet the hook does not exist.
> I am checking out the WC and using post update hook - that means that WC
> should already exist, shouldn't it?
>> I think a switch operation could just use the corresponding update
>> hooks because update is really just a special case of switch with no
>> path change.
> Right now it doesn't and this fact is rather unpleasant to me.
Can you file an issue for this please?
Just add a feature request that the hook script(s) should also get
invoked for switch/checkout.
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-05-06 19:14:42 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev