[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is it a bug or by design?

From: Serge Tumanyan <tumanyan_at_mail.ru>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 04:30:37 -0700

Hello, Simon.

>> I has tryed to use TSVN client hooks and ran into a trouble:
>> I have added a post update hook and assumed that this one should work
>> after
>> the checkout, switch and update commands but found out that it works only
>> after the update command. Is this by design or it is a bug? If this by
>> design - can the hooks for checkout and switch commands be added to TSVN?
>> It
>> reduces productivity when you can not recompile the WC after the checkout
>> in
>> one step or after switching branches immediately and need to start a
>> false
>> update process to start a script. The missing hooks for the switch
>> command
>> tortures me especially much because I usually use switch command really
>> often for my development tasks.
> Why checkout? The hook scripts have to be set up for a specific WC, so
> if you have not checked out a WC yet the hook does not exist.

I am checking out the WC and using post update hook - that means that WC
should already exist, shouldn't it?

> I think a switch operation could just use the corresponding update
> hooks because update is really just a special case of switch with no
> path change.

Right now it doesn't and this fact is rather unpleasant to me.

Thank you.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2010-05-06 13:30:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.