On 21.12.2009 10:12, Hans-Emil Skogh wrote:
> >>>> If we changed "Hide unrelated changed paths" into "Show only changed
> >>>> paths" or "Show only affected paths", we have a positive option
> instead
> >>>> of double negative.
> >> Should this be "Show only selected paths"? That's what we are talking
> >> about - the paths you had selected in Explorer when the dialog was
> >> invoked.
> > Not really. Because "selected" could be misinterpreted as the selected
> > revision, and then users would wonder about which paths are in the
> > selected revision.
> ...but "affted paths" is similarily ambigious. The list is per default
> showing paths affected by the commit.
> I would suggest that we change to "Show only chosen path", or maybe
> "Show only invoked path" or even "Show only designated path".
> In addition, it would be good if we could sense if the selected path was
> a file or a directory and change to "Show only chosen file" or "Show
> only chosen directory" to make it even clearer.
These aren't really good either: they all refer to only the path that
was chosen to show the log for. But the checkbox and its feature will
show/filter paths that are the chosen path and all paths below it. So
not just the selected path but all its children too.
That's why I chose "affected paths" for the checkbox. Not the best
wording maybe, but more accurate than e.g. "only chosen path".
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2432055
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-12-21 19:03:05 CET