Re: Feature request - Log dialog

On 18.12.2009 09:23, Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Hans-Emil wrote:
>> Maybe the wording on the option could be clearer? Unrelated to what?
>
> I think one of the problem lies in the double negation. We programmers
> tend to use boolean logic even when we write text :)
>
> If we changed "Hide unrelated changed paths" into "Show only changed
> paths" or "Show only affected paths", we have a positive option instead
> of double negative.
>
> Unchecked - show no "unrelated" paths.
> Half - show all paths and highlight unrelated paths in grey.
> Checked - show all paths without highlighting.
>
> Am I allowed to ask the question why we have three states at all? Half
> checked provides all information: a) it shows all paths b) it highlights
> them. "Checked" reduces the information again.
> IMHO we could drop the third state and go with unchecked/checked, where
> checked shows all paths with highlighting. Unless someone can convince
> me that we really need three states off course.

Done in r18070.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2431685
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].