Re: Feature request - Log dialog

Hans-Emil wrote:
> Maybe the wording on the option could be clearer? Unrelated to what?

I think one of the problem lies in the double negation. We programmers
tend to use boolean logic even when we write text :)

If we changed "Hide unrelated changed paths" into "Show only changed
paths" or "Show only affected paths", we have a positive option instead
of double negative.

Unchecked - show no "unrelated" paths.
Half - show all paths and highlight unrelated paths in grey.
Checked - show all paths without highlighting.

Am I allowed to ask the question why we have three states at all? Half
checked provides all information: a) it shows all paths b) it highlights
them. "Checked" reduces the information again.
IMHO we could drop the third state and go with unchecked/checked, where
checked shows all paths with highlighting. Unless someone can convince
me that we really need three states off course.

Cheers
- Lübbe

--
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net  PGP Key ID 0x23F511AB
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=2431401
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].