Hans-Emil Skogh wrote:
>>> I would very much appreciate more details on the merged revisions in
>>> blame. Would it be possible to show when the change was merged and by
>>> who, for example in the popup-text for now?
>> Good idea.
> I see this has ben implemented in the latest nightly. Nice!
>
> Could you also add the revision when the merge happened to the tool-tip?
> I guess that we currently do not have readily accessible the information
> about what user that performed the merge and when, but the revision
> number is present in the blame-file.
> I would propose adding "Merged in revision #" under the dashed line and
> above the merge log message in the tool tip.
Done in r16161.
>
>>> Could you also please provide more helpful headers in the generated
>>> blame file? I would propose "change rev" and "merge rev" instead of just
>>> "rev" and "rev".
>> Also good idea:
>
> This is also changed in the latest nightly, however it seems as
> the order of the headers have been switched. The first column reads
> "merged" and the second one "rev". The correct order should be first
> "rev" and then "merged".
Fixed in r16160.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=1729871
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-15 18:50:52 CEST