Hi Lübbe,
sorry for the late response .. I had a mail connectivity issue
last WE :(
Lübbe Onken <luebbe.tortoisesvn_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Simon Large wrote:
> > In this case a simple solution might be to include the brackets, so
> > "(copy)" instead of "copy".
> >
> > "Copy source only" might be better as "Copy created from here" or
> > simply left without a label.
> >
> I like Simon's suggestion. Drop the "copy source only" tag. Maybe I miss
> something here, but it doesn't provide me with additional information.
> At least in my revision graphs, the copy source is directly next to the
tag.
>
> Include the action into brackets, so you can remove the brackets from
> the formatting string.
I wasn't aware of the way the POT files work.
These issues should be fixed by now.
> BTW shouldn't a "renamed" object display the "Copy from" information as
> well?
That plus a number of smaller issues (HEAD, WC etc.)
are fixed as well.
> I also have a problem that the combination of colours and hint texts
> doesn't make sense to me in some cases. See attached screen shots
> 1) "All revisions" are shown:
> A branch that has been renamed in r2314 gets a blue node and the
> "rename" tag -> sounds good
> It contains deletions and renames in r2315, gets a red node colour and
> the tag "modified" -> sounds good, but why red? Because "delete" is the
> strongest action? But the branch still exists?!?
>
> 2) "All revisions" are turned off:
> The same branch now gets a red node in r2314 with the "rename" tag in
> the hint. -> Doesn't make sense to me.
This is the intended behavior and at least to me it
seemed like the best balance between 'confusion due
to unexpected information presentation' and 'confusion
due to missing information'.
Let me explain. As long as don't exclude deleted
branches from the graph, the respective 'deletion'
node will be shown as expected. When deleted branches
have been removed, some parts will remain visible:
those that get copied to some path (e.g. tag) still
in existence. Hence, those deleted paths are still
visible.
Now, the problem is how to prevent a "I thought it
was deleted?!' reaction. My solution is to show the
last remaining node on the path in 'deleted' color.
Do you have an alternative proposal?
-- Stefan^2.
------------------------------------------------------
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=757&dsMessageId=1054417
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_tortoisesvn.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-01-26 12:46:25 CET