FX wrote:
> Russell Hind wrote:
>
>> I'm quite happy with 1.2.4 at the moment, but I think some issues may
>> arise in that people don't want to upgrade to subversion 1.3 at some
>> point. With 1.2.1, there were svn problems with talking to 1.1.x
>> servers.
>>
>> We will wait on upgrading our server for a few months after 1.3 has
>> been released to make sure any wrinkles have been ironed out, but will
>> probably also wait on upgrading clients for quite a whlle too which
>> means we are stuck with 1.2.4
>>
> I think most companies or teams of developers won't upgrade to 1.3
> branch until at least 1.3.1 or 1.3.2--unlike lone developers or the
> adventurous. This will probably be the case for both svn server and
> tsvn client.
>
> Another factor is Debian having subversion 1.1.4 in their recently
> released stable branch. A lot of places just prefer to track stable
> branch because of fast security updates and guaranteed compatibility for
> automatically updated packages. People tracking Debian's testing branch
> got burned by having to wait weeks or even months for security updates
> to various packages while the stable branch got updates right away. So
> don't be surprised if 1.1.4 servers remain popular for another 12 months
> or more.
>
> Anyway, a bugfix-only 1.2.x release would be highly appreciated but we
> understand if time/resource/preference of developers don't make it
> happen. Regardless of the decision, thanks and keep up the great work!
Which bugs are causing you particular problems?
Simon
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 19 21:19:27 2005