[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] TortoiseSVN FAQ

From: SteveKing <steveking_at_gmx.ch>
Date: 2005-06-22 17:02:45 CEST

Simon Large wrote:
> I think we should store the docs a little differently:
>
> Ship CHM with the product only, no separate download.

Why? It's still interesting for people investigating TSVN. If they first
want to browse the docs locally without having TSVN installed...

> Re-site HTML to SourceForge as an online reference.

+1.

> Drop PDF altogether. SVN needs multi-platform readability, but we don't.

PDF's are also used for printing, not just for multi-platform.

> The online version should still be generated from the latest release
> tag, not HEAD. Otherwise we are documenting features which only exist in
> the nightly and that will generate more 'why doesn't this work like the
> manual says' queries. The nightly has its own CHM anyway.

Ok.

> If we want the HEAD docs generally available, then I think it should be
> as well as the released version.

I don't think HEAD docs are important.

Stefan

-- 
        ___
   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 22 17:03:09 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.