[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] TSVN vs SVN Performance Issue

From: Simon Large <slarge_at_slarge.plus.com>
Date: 2005-06-08 14:55:52 CEST

jwhitby@bankofny.com wrote:
> I've just repeated running "SVN LOG -V w:\myWC\a.txt" using both SVN
> 1.1.4 & SVN 1.2.0. Results below:
>
> Version Time FileMonitor Accesses
> 1.1.4 18s 37,829
> 1.2.0 290s 654,998!
>
> looks like a "real SVN bug" to me!
>
> As the OP said if you drop the -v results are very similar:
>
> Version Time FileMonitor Accesses
> 1.1.4 13s 31,756
> 1.2.0 13s 33,335

Thanks. I have forwarded this information to the SVN dev list.

> As I don't need the lock functionality of SVN 1.2.0 Can I use the
> TSVNCache from TSVN 1.2.0 with TSVN 1.1.7?

No. 1.1.7 does not use the external cache at all, I assume you want this
to make overlays useable on a network drive.

If you are the sole user, you could just move the repo to your hard
drive. Or install svnserve on a local PC. Either way you would have to
organise your own backup. Hopefully this will be fixed in SVN 1.2.1
which should not be too far away.

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 8 14:56:10 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.