Re: [TSVN] What overlays do we NEED

SteveKing wrote:
> 2005/4/14, Simon Large <slarge@slarge.plus.com>:
> [snip]
>
> The only overlay I think *might* not be that important is the "added"
> one. But that's also the first one to go down the drain if there are
> not enough slots available.
>
>>> Hmmm now that I think about it more - is there any particular reason
>>> why NOT to make the overlay slots we use User Configerable?
>
> No need to - just delete the corresponding icon from the installation
> folder.

But if you delete 'Added' do you get 'Modified' automatically in its
place?

And when you upgrade (to the next nightly?), the icons will be back
again.

But all this is a _very_ low priority. Let's get the locking sorted ;-)

Simon

-- 
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org