SteveKing <steveking@gmx.ch> wrote on 03/22/2005 12:14:14 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > SteveKing <steveking@gmx.ch> wrote on 03/22/2005 12:06:25 PM:
> >
> >
> >>Since most (all?) of you are in favour of releasing a version 1.1.4 as
a
> >
> >
> >>bugfix to 1.1.3 I'd like to hear which revisions you want to merge
back
> >>(which bugs you want to have fixed in the 1.1.4 release).
> >>So fire up the log dialog and have a close look ;)
> >
> >
> > I thought you meant it would be 1.1.3 built on Subversion 1.1.4. That
way
> > we get the benefit of the Subversion bug fixes. I guess if there were
a
> > couple of nasty TSVN bugs those could also be backported, but I would
be
> > in favor of a pure Subversion update as well.
>
> Sure, 1.1.4 will of course be built against Subversion 1.1.4!
I know, but I thought that was going to be the only difference. I am
saying that I would personally consider that to be an option. You can
make it #4 on your list if you like.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 22 19:05:07 2005