[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Re: Merge dialog, second attempt

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-01-26 18:36:49 CET

DStonham@pennysaverusa.com wrote on 01/26/2005 11:45:44 AM:

> > Just because the command line syntax is poor does not seem a good
> to
> > continue to burden the GUI user.
> Oddly the N-1 thing hasn't bitten me yet, although I am admittedly quite
> new to SVN.
> As long as you think of each revision number as being a state and the
> movement between two revisions as being the action it actually makes
> perfect sense. Then you stop thinking about applying revision X and
> thinking about applying the action that took you from revision X-1 to
> revision X.
> Does this make sense to anyone or am I just rambling?

I do not know if it will help anyone or not, but Yes, the way you describe
it is how the feature was designed and how the svn devs likely imagined a
user would think of it.

At least in my opinion.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 26 18:37:38 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.