[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Re: Re: TSVN Merge issue vs. "Feature Branches" in SVN boo k

From: Rainer Müller <mueller_rainer_at_gmx.de>
Date: 2005-01-13 17:52:29 CET

Simon Large wrote:
> One of the problems we need to avoid is creating confusion over reversed
> merges. I want to back out revs 323 to 324, so I merge from:324 to:323.
> If you try to put that into old/new terminology you can get yourself in
> a twist.
>
> There might be a case for a Reverse Merge checkbox, so we require the
> user always to set (End >= Start), but reverse them internally in the
> case of an 'undo' merge.

I don't like introducing the term 'reverse merge' because it is a merge
like any other.
"Merge the range starting with 324 and ending with 323 into WC" sounds
okay to me.

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 13 17:55:08 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.