[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[TSVN] Re: Re: TSVN Merge issue vs. "Feature Branches" in SVN boo k

From: Simon Large <slarge_at_blazepoint.co.uk>
Date: 2005-01-13 15:56:15 CET

Will Dean wrote:
> So far, I think we have the following suggestions:
> To, From
> Start, End
> Old, New (Older,Newer?)
> First, Last
> Are we going to vote on this, eventually?

Not yet. My brain is still grinding through other possible methods.

One of the problems we need to avoid is creating confusion over reversed
merges. I want to back out revs 323 to 324, so I merge from:324 to:323.
If you try to put that into old/new terminology you can get yourself in
a twist.

There might be a case for a Reverse Merge checkbox, so we require the
user always to set (End >= Start), but reverse them internally in the
case of an 'undo' merge.

And I am still worrying away at a better way of fitting in the optional
'To:' URL...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 13 15:56:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.