[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [TSVN] Severe performance degradation observed

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2004-12-13 18:38:33 CET

Nicklas Norling <exinor@exinor.net> wrote on 12/13/2004 12:25:49 PM:

> Yes, in my first test I did have two explorers up using the same folder.

> The reason was that the first explorer virtually
> froze. The second one did not freeze, but was very slow. The later tests

> when I installed the nightly for the second
> time was with only one explorer up. I'd say displaying the overlays for
> the visible content takes me around 3s. But
> the explorer process continues to consume all CPU until it has
> calculated all overlays are calculated (even the once
> Could TSVN and TCVS interfer with each other? I'm at a loss here, but
> it's certainly slow.

Have you checked the same timestamp issue that you suggested to someone
else? I imagine if you did a clean checkout that would be a way to test.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 13 18:39:11 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.