Re: [TSVN] Another go at a patch for SVNFolderStatus
From: SteveKing <steveking_at_gmx.ch>
Date: 2004-10-28 19:18:20 CEST
Will Dean wrote:
> Let's not do that then, let's do what it asks for.
That's what I'm trying to do ;)
> There is definitely a bug in there are the moment, which is the following:
And that's usually correct. Imagine the following:
now, the shell asks for the status of
if we then get the status for
> Ignoring anything to do with SVN bugs, surely this wasn't what you
It was. I just didn't take the column provider into the calculation ;)
> What I'm seeing is that *nobody* asks for the status of the parent
Yes, the shell asks for the status of the parent via the column provider.
> I think if we just looked up the item we were asked for that would be a
definitely not! Try it once - you'll revert your changes after the first
I'm currently trying to differ between the column provider calls and the
Stefan
-- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Oct 28 21:23:45 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the TortoiseSVN Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.