[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Latest Subclipse (1.10.13) Unreliable

From: Jamie Jackson <jamiejaxon_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:54:57 -0400

Hi Stephen, when will your fix make it to the update site?

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Stephen Elsemore <selsemore_at_collab.net>
wrote:

> Also, fwiw, I fixed the problem that you referenced below (NPE when trying
> to switch to a bad branch) without ever being able to reproduce the problem
> myself.
>
>
>
> *From: *Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:34 PM
> *To: *users <users_at_subclipse.tigris.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Subclipse-users] Latest Subclipse (1.10.13) Unreliable
>
>
>
> As you know, we have barely modified the product in several years, so it
> is not like it suddenly changed to become unreliable. The only thing that
> is changing is the SVN client underneath it, so most likely there are some
> kind of behavior changes in SVN 1.9.
>
>
>
> The version from the 1.12.x update site is identical to the one in the
> 1.10.x update site. One of them just contains SVN 1.8.x client and the
> other SVN 1.9.x. since you cannot host both versions on one update site.
>
>
>
> So perhaps there are some code changes needed for SVN 1.9. The API has
> not changed but maybe its behavior has.
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Jamie Jackson <jamiejaxon_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I've been using Subclipse for probably over a decade now, but the
> version(s) from the 1.12 updater site have been driving me crazy.
>
>
>
> I'm getting:
>
>
>
> 1. Hung merges
> 2. An issue with failed switches blocking any other SVN operations
> from running <http://subclipse.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1654>
> 3. Queued SVN operations causing hangs (say I revert then switch
> without waiting for the revert to complete)
> 4. Tree conflicts that a revert won't fix. Subclipse-invoked cleanups
> don't help. I have to go to TortoiseSVN to revert.
> 5. Long delays in the project reflecting the new URL (in Project
> Explorer) after a switch (actually, that last issue goes as far back as I
> can remember, though an svn update post-switch seems to refresh it).
>
>
>
> The first few issues require an Eclipse restart (or often, I have to kill
> the Eclipse process from Task Manager). I have to restart (or kill) Eclipse
> several times an hour.
>
>
>
> Sometimes I'm forced to give up and use TortoiseSVN, but for most things,
> I prefer Subclipse (when it's working well).
>
>
>
> Are others having these problems, too? If so, have you, say, downgraded
> your Subclipse? Have you switched to another Eclipse SVN client?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3185183

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2016-09-08 19:55:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.