Re: [Subclipse-users] Latest Subclipse (1.10.13) Unreliable
From: Stephen Elsemore <selsemore_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:39:09 +0000
Also, fwiw, I fixed the problem that you referenced below (NPE when trying to switch to a bad branch) without ever being able to reproduce the problem myself.
From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
As you know, we have barely modified the product in several years, so it is not like it suddenly changed to become unreliable. The only thing that is changing is the SVN client underneath it, so most likely there are some kind of behavior changes in SVN 1.9.
The version from the 1.12.x update site is identical to the one in the 1.10.x update site. One of them just contains SVN 1.8.x client and the other SVN 1.9.x. since you cannot host both versions on one update site.
So perhaps there are some code changes needed for SVN 1.9. The API has not changed but maybe its behavior has.
Mark
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Jamie Jackson <jamiejaxon_at_gmail.com<mailto:jamiejaxon_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm getting:
1. Hung merges
The first few issues require an Eclipse restart (or often, I have to kill the Eclipse process from Task Manager). I have to restart (or kill) Eclipse several times an hour.
Sometimes I'm forced to give up and use TortoiseSVN, but for most things, I prefer Subclipse (when it's working well).
Are others having these problems, too? If so, have you, say, downgraded your Subclipse? Have you switched to another Eclipse SVN client?
Thanks,
-- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=3185159 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].Received on 2016-09-08 16:39:20 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.