Re: [Subclipse-users] CollabNet merge tool on Subclipse 1.6, Eclipse 3.5 OS X Carbon, javaHL

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Bradley
Wagner<bradley.wagner_at_hannonhill.com> wrote:
>
>> The downside, is that you have to use the Apache it includes etc,
>> which should be OK if just using it for SVN.
>
> Unfortunately it's not. This is been the worry with trying to upgrade SVN in
> the first place. We should have looked into running SVN on it's on Apache,
> different port from the beginning.
>
> What's your take on the SVN 1.3 to 1.6 jump as a developer? Worth it? I was
> hoping for a serious performance boost for common operations (update,
> checkout, merge, synchronize) and can't tell how much of that is there. The
> merge-tracking alone though might be enough motivation for us.

I cannot think of any significant performance boosts you should see.
Some things like merge will likely even be slower.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2367561
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].