[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] CollabNet merge tool on Subclipse 1.6, Eclipse 3.5 OS X Carbon, javaHL

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:57:01 -0400

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Bradley
Wagner<bradley.wagner_at_hannonhill.com> wrote:
>> The downside, is that you have to use the Apache it includes etc,
>> which should be OK if just using it for SVN.
> Unfortunately it's not. This is been the worry with trying to upgrade SVN in
> the first place. We should have looked into running SVN on it's on Apache,
> different port from the beginning.
> What's your take on the SVN 1.3 to 1.6 jump as a developer? Worth it? I was
> hoping for a serious performance boost for common operations (update,
> checkout, merge, synchronize) and can't tell how much of that is there. The
> merge-tracking alone though might be enough motivation for us.

I cannot think of any significant performance boosts you should see.
Some things like merge will likely even be slower.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-02 20:57:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.