Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.6.2: Annotate with merge info has problems

On 4/1/2009 12:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM, David Rothenberger <daveroth_at_acm.org> wrote:
>> On 4/1/2009 10:24 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, David Rothenberger <daveroth_at_acm.org> wrote:
>>>> When I do Show Annotation with "Include merged versions" check, the
>>>> results are incorrect for lines that were changed in a version from a
>>>> merge. When I do it without "Include merged versions", the results
>>>> appear correct.
>>> Are you saying the boolean appears reversed?
>> No. Sorry for being unclear.
>>
>> When I do Annotate without the flag set, I get the correct annotations
>> ignoring merge information. When I do Annotate with the flag set, lines
>> are attributed to the wrong versions. Lines that were changed in a
>> version from a merge are always incorrect, but it appears that other
>> lines from versions not from a merge are also incorrect.
>>
>> However, on further investigation, I find that the "svn blame -g" output
>> on this file from my command-line client is also messed up, so I guess
>> this isn't a problem with Subclipse.
>>
>> Sorry for the noise.
>
> I see the same. I've added handling for the new notification #20 too.
>

I think this is a known issue in Subversion:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3243

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth_at_acm.org
sunset, n.:
         Pronounced atmospheric scattering of shorter wavelengths,
         resulting in selective transmission below 650 nanometers with
         progressively reducing solar elevation.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=1510011
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].