Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.6.2: Annotate with merge info has problems

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM, David Rothenberger <daveroth_at_acm.org> wrote:
> On 4/1/2009 10:24 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, David Rothenberger <daveroth_at_acm.org> wrote:
>>> When I do Show Annotation with "Include merged versions" check, the
>>> results are incorrect for lines that were changed in a version from a
>>> merge. When I do it without "Include merged versions", the results
>>> appear correct.
>>
>> Are you saying the boolean appears reversed?
>
> No. Sorry for being unclear.
>
> When I do Annotate without the flag set, I get the correct annotations
> ignoring merge information. When I do Annotate with the flag set, lines
> are attributed to the wrong versions. Lines that were changed in a
> version from a merge are always incorrect, but it appears that other
> lines from versions not from a merge are also incorrect.
>
> However, on further investigation, I find that the "svn blame -g" output
> on this file from my command-line client is also messed up, so I guess
> this isn't a problem with Subclipse.
>
> Sorry for the noise.

I see the same. I've added handling for the new notification #20 too.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=1509821
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].