[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Harmful change in Subclipse 1.4 - why unversioned items are autocommited ???

From: <Greg.Huber_at_ricoh.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:22:05 +0100

Mark,

I rechecked the items showing and it is works as expected. There were
other folders that also needed the svn:ignore. Sorry for the time waste.

It seems safer to use the commit from the java perspective as it
eliminates the possibility of committing unversioned items as it remembers
the check status. Unforunately, its a subtle change that may catch out
users.

Cheers Greg

"Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com>
12/08/2008 14:35
Please respond to
users_at_subclipse.tigris.org

To
users_at_subclipse.tigris.org
cc

Subject
Re: [Subclipse-users] Harmful change in Subclipse 1.4 - why unversioned
items are autocommited ???

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, <Greg.Huber_at_ricoh.co.uk> wrote:

>> "Eclipse/Subversion also gives you several ways to automatically ignore
>> files."
>
> It looks like from the team synchronizing perspective it ignores any
> properties set, eg svn:ignore, and wants to add all unversioned files
if
> the check box is ticked. Not sure if its possible to check this
setting?

Anything that shows in the dialog and is selected should be committed.
 That is the intent. However, things that are ignored should not
appear in the dialog or in the Synchronizing view. That is the point
of the ignore features after all. If you are seeing different, please
provide some details so we can focus on why the ignored items are
showing up for you.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Share our environment commitment - conserve resources and contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions by not printing the email unless absolutely necessary to do so. 
Any opinions expressed are those of the author, not Ricoh UK Ltd. This communication does not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in writing. It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure this email and attachments are free from computer viruses before use and the sender accepts no responsibility or liability for any such computer viruses. 
Ricoh UK Ltd. may monitor the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purpose of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. This communication contains information, which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email with a copy to  postmaster_at_ricoh.co.uk . Please contact us on +44 (0) 208 261 4000 if you need assistance. 
Registered in England No: 1505381 
VAT No: GB 354 2816 54  --=_alternative 00542FBC802574A3_Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Mark,</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I rechecked the items showing and it
is works as expected. &nbsp;There were other folders that also needed the
svn:ignore. &nbsp;Sorry for the time waste. <br><br>It seems safer to use the commit from the java perspective as it eliminates
the possibility of committing unversioned items as it remembers the check
status. &nbsp;Unforunately, its a subtle change that may catch out users.</font><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>Cheers Greg<br><br></font><br><br><br><table width=100%><tr valign=top><td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>&quot;Mark Phippard&quot;
&lt;markphip_at_gmail.com&gt;</b> </font><p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/08/2008 14:35</font><table border><tr valign=top><td bgcolor=white><div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>users_at_subclipse.tigris.org</font></div></table><br><td width=59%><table width=100%><tr valign=top><td><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div><td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">users_at_subclipse.tigris.org</font><tr valign=top><td><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div><td><tr valign=top><td><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div><td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [Subclipse-users] Harmful change
in Subclipse 1.4 - why unversioned items are autocommited ???</font></table><br><table><tr valign=top><td><td></table><br></table><br><br><br><font size=2><tt>On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, &nbsp;&lt;Greg.Huber_at_ricoh.co.uk&gt;
wrote:<br><br>&gt;&gt; &quot;Eclipse/Subversion also gives you several ways to automatically
ignore<br>&gt;&gt; files.&quot;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; It looks like from the team synchronizing perspective it ignores any<br>&gt; properties set, &nbsp;eg svn:ignore, and wants to add all unversioned
files if<br>&gt; the check box is ticked. &nbsp;Not sure if its possible to check this
setting?<br><br>Anything that shows in the dialog and is selected should be committed.<br> That is the intent. &nbsp;However, things that are ignored should not<br>appear in the dialog or in the Synchronizing view. &nbsp;That is the point<br>of the ignore features after all. &nbsp;If you are seeing different, please<br>provide some details so we can focus on why the ignored items are<br>showing up for you.<br><br>-- <br>Thanks<br><br>Mark Phippard<br>http://markphip.blogspot.com/<br><br>---------------------------------------------------------------------<br>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org<br>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org<br><br></tt></font><br><font face="sans-serif"><BR><p align="left"><font face="Arial" size="1"><font color="#006600" face="Arial" size="1"><b>Share our environment commitment - conserve resources and contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions by not printing the email unless absolutely necessary to do so.</b></font><BR><BR>Any opinions expressed are those of the author, not Ricoh UK Ltd. This communication does not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in writing. It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure this email and attachments are free from computer viruses before use and the sender accepts no responsibility or liability for any such computer viruses.<BR><BR>Ricoh UK Ltd. may monitor the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purpose of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. This communication contains information, which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email with a copy to <a  href="mailto:postmaster@ricoh.co.uk">postmaster@ricoh.co.uk</a>. Please contact us on +44 (0) 208 261 4000 if you need assistance.<BR><BR>Registered in England No: 1505381<BR>VAT No: GB 354 2816 54 </font></p></font>
Received on 2008-08-12 17:20:51 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.