RE: [Subclipse-users] Configure Branch/Tags bug
From: Lira Olavo <Olavo.LIRA_at_gemalto.com>
Date: 2007-03-16 15:40:01 CET
Hi Mark,
I'll add an issue now in order to not get lost, but just to clarify a little bit more why I think it should be changed...
When you right-click and do the "add tag" after you click the OK button I think you should at least say to the user "tag revision NNN added from path \toto\tags". Also it would much better if the user tries to add something that is already there to say: "The tag revision NNN in path \toto\tags is already configured". Other wise you could have a dirty subclipse:tags property...
Anyway, I'll create the issue now.
Thanks,
===========
On 3/12/07, Lira Olavo <Olavo.LIRA@gemalto.com> wrote:
Does someone agree with me on that issue? Should I file an
I haven't decided yet if I agree it is a problem, but I certainly do not have any problem with you filing this as an issue. I am having a hard time attaching the importance to it that you seem to feel it deserves.
I am pretty sure the current behavior is intentional, at least as much as we knew it worked this way when we added it. I certainly am not aware of any problems it can cause in the usage of the property by Subclipse. Obviously in the case where you add the same thing multiple times it would be expected that you would go back and assign different identifiers to each instance.
Anyway, please add the issue so that it does not get lost.
-- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Mar 16 15:40:25 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.