"Mark Hewett" <mark.hewett@gmail.com> wrote on 07/17/2006 02:39:19 PM:
> On 7/17/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
> >
> > Try using the command line status command with the full absolute path
to
> > one of these files. That is more the equivalent of what we are asking
> > Subversion. I do not think Subversion will consider the file to be
> > ignored in that case.
> >
> > Is there any reason that Maven is not using the svn export command,
> > instead of checkout? I would think it would not want/need the
overhead of
> > a working copy in the target folder.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> Yes, the command line does show the change using the full path to the
> file - although that brings up the question of why Subclipse would be
> asking for the status of resources under an ignored directory
> (although maybe this would explain why it seems to take so long for
> the synchronize to complete, since a lot of files get put under the
> target directory).
When the files get added into your workspace we are notified. We maintain
a status cache that we use to drive most operations. Since we are
notified on a file by file basis that is ultimately how it gets populated.
I did not write this code so I could be fudging this a bit. We start by
checking the status of the file because if the file is versioned then that
will be the fastest answer.
And yes, this will cause Synchronize to take longer. If they used export,
we would just see all those files as ignored and you'd save a lot of disk
space.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 17 20:52:07 2006