On 7/17/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
>
> Try using the command line status command with the full absolute path to
> one of these files. That is more the equivalent of what we are asking
> Subversion. I do not think Subversion will consider the file to be
> ignored in that case.
>
> Is there any reason that Maven is not using the svn export command,
> instead of checkout? I would think it would not want/need the overhead of
> a working copy in the target folder.
>
> Mark
>
Yes, the command line does show the change using the full path to the
file - although that brings up the question of why Subclipse would be
asking for the status of resources under an ignored directory
(although maybe this would explain why it seems to take so long for
the synchronize to complete, since a lot of files get put under the
target directory).
Anyway, your export vs. checkout suggestion seems like the correct way
for Maven to go, since I don't think that the release process is
making any changes to the tag version that it is fetching (lets hope
not!). I'll bring this up on the Maven list.
Thanks for the quick response.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 17 20:39:30 2006