Aaron Digulla <digulla@hepe.com> wrote on 03/07/2006 05:22:12 AM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > The more common use case for a delete is that the file is really meant
> > to be deleted. In that scenario, this property can still work for
you,
> > it just is not ideal. For example, if you were to do an update,
before
> > doing a commit, I believe the update process may restore missing
files.
> > There is a way around this problem though. The Show Pending
Operations
> > view will show missing files, and for those files, there is a Mark as
> > Deleted option available from that view which will run the svn delete
> > command so that the delete is registered with Subversion. If you are
> > going to use this feature, I would recommend that you either use this
> > feature to mark your deletes, or commit the deletes soon.
>
> So it basically comes again down to the problem that Synchronize Update
> doesn't really sync but runs the standard SVN commands which have a
> slightly different semantic. :-/
>
> Can you please open an issue that "Update" in the sync view doesn't work
> as expected?
Sorry, I do not see the relationship between the Synch view and update,
and this disucssion on deleting and re-adding the same file.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 7 15:34:45 2006