On Saturday 04 March 2006 08:36 pm, Mark Phippard wrote:
> David Corbin <dcorbin@machturtle.com> wrote on 03/04/2006 06:04:15 PM:
> > I've figured out part of what I was doing wrong. I was doing a proplist
>
> when
>
> > I needed to do
> > a propget.
>
> In Subclipse, do Team -> Show Properties.
>
> > Is there subclipse feature for 'hiding' a branch? I've essentially
>
> got
>
> > multiple projects in one tree (not the way I want to do things, but it's
>
> the
>
> > rails way, and woe unto he who doesn't follow rails conventions:) ), but
>
> I
>
> > really only want to manage one (the root) through subclipse. I wouldn't
>
> even
>
> > have the others under it, but I have to create a patch, and for whomever
>
> to
>
> > release a version with that patch, before I can just eliminate it.
>
> If you are saying you need to checkout some folder, and you want some of
> the subfolders to not checkout, then the answer is that Subversion does
> not support that, so there is no way for Subclipse to support it either.
> All you can really do is organize the tree differently. This is one of
> the main reasons, Subversion recommends this kind of layout:
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying on my local working copy, the tree
refers to multiple different repositories (effectively -- either by being
svn:external, or by an explicit checkout). But I really don't want subclipse
worry about changes to anything that's refering to a repository other than my
"root" repository. (It's not that I expect subclipse to have this feature,
just a hope...)
>
> Project
>
> |--branches
> |--tags
> |--trunk
>
> Mark
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 5 02:59:55 2006