Re: [Subclipse-users] Major refactoring - issues?

On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:22 -0500, Scott Palmer wrote:
> I find the use of the term "rename" unintuitive in this context.
> If the operation were carefully worded to show that it was moving the
> contents of the default package to a new package, instead of changing
> the name of the default package (which I believe will cause confusion
> for beginners) then I would be more comfortable with the concept.

That would be easy enough. If it's a real package, then the menu for
Refactor shows "Rename"; if it's a default package it shows "Convert to
a named package".

> Is not the real solution to the root problem to fix the integration
> with Subclipse so that it can add the new unversioned package to
> version control automatically?

Yes and no. That's where this line of thought started for me, but were I
doing this without versioning, I'd still prefer to have a simple rename
rather than a two- or three-step procedure. Adding stuff to version
control automatically is much less desirable than having
already-versioned stuff properly tracked.

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (w/h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org