Re: [Subclipse-users] Major refactoring - issues?

On 9-Feb-06, at 8:21 PM, Karl Auer wrote:

> This may just be a religious argument. I know full well what the
> default
> package is or is not, and I don't think it breaks anything to consider
> the default package (at least within Eclipse) as a package with a null
> name that can be changed to something else if desired.

I find the use of the term "rename" unintuitive in this context.
If the operation were carefully worded to show that it was moving the
contents of the default package to a new package, instead of changing
the name of the default package (which I believe will cause confusion
for beginners) then I would be more comfortable with the concept.

Is not the real solution to the root problem to fix the integration
with Subclipse so that it can add the new unversioned package to
version control automatically?

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 10 15:24:25 2006