[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Dropping the CommandLine adapter from Subclipse

From: Jörg von Frantzius <joerg.von.frantzius_at_artnology.com>
Date: 2005-12-02 15:29:07 CET

(Bugzilla would call that a mid-air collision ;)

Mark Phippard schrieb:
> I just do not think it makes sense to offer an option in Subclipse that we
> know does not work completely especially when there are good alternatives.
> It is not that difficult to obtain JavaHL anymore and the only barrier to
> using JavaSVN is file:// access for which there is a workaround.
> Does anyone have any strong feelings against this? And if you do, are you
> willing to invest the time to make the CommandLine adapter work? With the
> new --xml options in Subversion 1.3, most features could probably be
> implemented reliably if someone wanted to invest the time to do so. I do
> not have the time or inclination to do so.
I'd like to express my concern that the svn command line client per se
seems to be the most robust of the 3 interfaces, at least that's my
impression (JavaSVN and JavaHL are not hosted and developed on tigris,
are they?). So it would make for a good last resort when there are
problems with the other two.

Which doesn't mean that I'd have the time to contribute, unfortunately :-/

Dipl.-Inf. Jörg von Frantzius  |            artnology GmbH
                               |                Milastr. 4
Tel +49 (0)30 4435 099 26      |              10437 Berlin
Fax +49 (0)30 4435 099 99      |  http://www.artnology.com
Received on Sat Dec 3 01:29:07 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.