Re: Dropping the CommandLine adapter from Subclipse

(Bugzilla would call that a mid-air collision ;)

Mark Phippard schrieb:
> I just do not think it makes sense to offer an option in Subclipse that we
> know does not work completely especially when there are good alternatives.
> It is not that difficult to obtain JavaHL anymore and the only barrier to
> using JavaSVN is file:// access for which there is a workaround.
>
> Does anyone have any strong feelings against this? And if you do, are you
> willing to invest the time to make the CommandLine adapter work? With the
> new --xml options in Subversion 1.3, most features could probably be
> implemented reliably if someone wanted to invest the time to do so. I do
> not have the time or inclination to do so.
>
I'd like to express my concern that the svn command line client per se
seems to be the most robust of the 3 interfaces, at least that's my
impression (JavaSVN and JavaHL are not hosted and developed on tigris,
are they?). So it would make for a good last resort when there are
problems with the other two.

Which doesn't mean that I'd have the time to contribute, unfortunately :-/

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inf. Jörg von Frantzius  |            artnology GmbH
                               |                Milastr. 4
Tel +49 (0)30 4435 099 26      |              10437 Berlin
Fax +49 (0)30 4435 099 99      |  http://www.artnology.com
_______________________________|__________________________